899 F. Supp. 2d 83 - Taylor v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Bowen v. Yuckert · Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The claimant meets the insured status requirements of the Social Security Act through December 31, 2016. 2. The claimant has not engage in substantial gainful activity since July 1, 2010, the alleged disability onset date ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.1571 et seq.). 3. The claimant has the following severe impairments: cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease, sleep apnea, high blood pressure, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (c)). 4. The claimant does not have an impairment or combination of impairments that meets or medically equals the severity of one of the listed impairments in 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 ( 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (d), 404.1525 and 404.1526). 5. After careful consideration of the entire record, the undersigned finds that the claimant has the residual functional capacity to perform light work as defined in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1567 (b), except that he has to avoid skilled and semiskilled functions. He is capable of unskilled work avoiding environmental hazards and not dealing with the public. 6. The claimant is unable to perform his past relevant work ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.1565 ). 7. The claimant was born on September 1, 1966 and was 43 years old, which is defined as a younger individual age 18^9, on the alleged disability onset date ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.1563 ). 8. The claimant has at least a high school education and is able to communicate in English ( 20 C.F.R. § 404.1564 ). 9. Transferability of skills is not material to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.