State v. Otto’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. · State v. Hamilton · State v. Coolidge · State v. Kirby · Edstrom v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) there is no statement by the Legislature that clearly establishes the Legislature’s intent to abrogate the amelioration doctrine; (2) the amendment mitigates punishment; and (3) final judgment has not been entered. as of the date the amendment takes effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Luna-Pliego v. State“as a whole and interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scovel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.