Rotenberg v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018
2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co. · 37 Colo. App. 516 - Comfort Homes, Inc. v. Peterson · Davis Cattle Co. v. Great Western Sugar Co. · 393 F. Supp. 1165 - Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[all actions to recover a liquidated debt or an unliquidated, determinable amount of money.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“is capable of ascertainment by reference to an agreement or by simple computation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“While defendant may contest the number of hours plaintiff reasonably devoted to his cause, the amount is ‘determinable’ within the meaning of [section] 13-80-103.5 once such dispute is resolved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.