899 So. 2d 1233 - Ulysse v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Wardlow · Welsh v. Wisconsin · Illinois v. Charles McArthur · 594 So. 2d 292 - Fenelon v. State · Alfonso v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant suggests that the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment does not apply if the officers are pursuing a fleeing misdemeanant. That point has been resolved in this district adversely to the defendant's position. See Gasset v. State, 490 So.2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Hot pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanant is permissible where the misdemeanor is punishable by a jail sentence. Id. at 98 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“on the facts here, a reasonable officer would have probable cause to believe that the passenger had participated in the theft of the car ... or at the least, trespass in a conveyance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the officers were justifiably in hot pursuit of the passenger who ran into [Ulysse's] house”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.