899 So. 2d 403 - Matos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2022
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · Brim v. State · 875 So. 2d 408 - State v. Burris · Ramirez v. State · 548 So. 2d 188 - Stokes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 262. The court concluded that the trial court had not abused its discretion by finding that the process of recording and downloading SDM data was sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific community because the process was not the sort of method”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Accuracy of Pre-Crash Speed Captured by Event Data Recorders,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in production in automobiles for over a decade”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cast
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.