Sessums v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State · 749 So. 2d 246 - Henley v. State · 490 So. 2d 910 - Mann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“double jeopardy claims are procedurally barred ... [because the] [f]ailure to address a claim of double jeopardy at trial concludes that issue, it cannot then be raised initially in a motion for post-conviction relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowland v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.