Kirby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
59 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory · 592 So. 2d 156 - Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'n · State ex rel. C.T.G. v. M.A.B. · 439 So. 2d 125 - Underwood v. State · Monroe v. Harco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provisions of Section 13A-5-9 shall be applied retroactively by the sentencing judge or presiding judge for consideration of early parole of each nonviolent convicted offender based on evaluations performed by the Department of Corrections and approved by the Board of Pardons and Paroles and submitted to the court.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Butler v. State · Ex Parte State“". . . Reading § 13A-5-9.1 in conjunction with § 13A-5-9 , it is clear that a sentencing judge or a presiding judge can resentence only two narrowly defined classes of habitual offenders: those who had been sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole under the mandatory provisions of the HFOA upon conviction of a Class A felony with no prior Class A felony convictions; and those who had been sentenced to life imprisonment under the mandatory provisions of the HFOA upon conviction of a Class B felony. Moreover, of those habitual offenders, the judge can resentence only those who are nonviolent offenders."”
16 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wells v. State · Briggins v. State“the Legislature vested jurisdiction in the sentencing judge or the presiding judge to reopen a case more than 30 days after a defendant has been sentenced.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wells v. State · Ex Parte State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.