Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 899 S.W.2d 284 - Lacy v. State

Lacy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 114th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Scharffe v. Perkins · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the grand jury and petit jury did not represent a fair cross-section of the Harris County community”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “nothing is preserved for appellate review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.