State v. Dyle’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2014
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Butz v. Hein · Tate v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he degree of certainty expressed by the witness regarding the identification”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holt · Brodes v. State“On the one hand, eyewitness testimony is very believable and can wield considerable influence over the decisions reached by a jury; on the other hand, eyewitness testimony is not always reliable. It can be flawed simply because of the normal and natural memory processes that occur whenever human beings acquire, retain, and attempt to retrieve information." Elizabeth Loftus, Eyewitness Testimony 7 (1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brodes v. State“[T]here appears to be widespread agreement among the experts that the accuracy of eyewitness identification may be affected by several factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brodes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.