Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 899 SW2D 886 - White v. Sweeney

White v. Sweeney’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. Haid · Bentlage v. Springgate · Lee's Summit Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cross · Lucitt v. Estate of Toohey · State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. Dandurand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"That leaves the question of whether the Motion for New Trial delayed the finality of the judgment until the expiration of ninety days after its filing or its earlier ruling. If it does not, then the appeal was untimely. Although Rule 78, pertaining to new trials and after-trial motions is not listed as applicable to probate proceedings in the circuit court, we have been pointed to no rule and find none that prevents their filing. Such motions were allowed at common law and are part of the common law adopted by Missouri."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.