¶1Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We do not interpret the direction to state the number of visits (o physicians as requiring the names of physicians. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Onondaga Special Term precluding plaintiff from giving certain testimony unless he specified more particularly in answer to a demand for a bill of particulars.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.
9 A.D.2d 867
Attia v. Koelling
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1959
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1959-11-13
Decided 1959-11-13