Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ala. App. 66

Stone v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1914

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1914-01-13

<p> Adultery. </p> <p>Adultery; Verdict; Related Charges. — The jury is not required to find by their verdict which one of the related charges a defendant is guilty of under an indictment charging adultery or fornication.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1929

1 state decisions

Relies on White v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1914-01-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PELHAM, J. —

¶1The indictment charges living in adultery or fornication, in the form prescribed by the Code (Cr. Code, p. 672, form 69), and the jury were not required, in finding the defendant guilty, to specify •which of the alternative related charges contained in *67tbe indictment, i. e., adultery or fornication, they found to be true. — White v. State, 74 Ala. 31.

¶2The record contains no error, and the judgment of conviction, appealed from on the record without a bill of exceptions, is affirmed.

¶3Affirmed.

/9/alaapp/66 · .json · Public domain