Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 ARIZ 157 - McCoy v. Brooks

McCoy v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2002

22 state decisions

8019051910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graffam v. Burgess · Henderson v. Sublett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the inadequacy is so glaring and gross as at once to shock the understanding and conscience of an honest and just man, it will, of itself, authorize the court to set aside the sale....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We think the better rule is that inadequacy of price may be so gross as to create the presumption of fraud or misconduct on the part of the officer or the purchaser.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.