9 Ariz. App. 253 - State v. Cumbo’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably State v. Kelly (1974), State v. Moore (1972)
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Fay v. Noia · Pointer v. Texas · Barber v. Page · Mattox v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is this Court’s opinion that the double-shot picture with front and profile alongside each other, unless disguised so as not to appear to be a ‘mug shot’, and absent an explanation that the picture was taken at defendant’s arrest on the charge involved, intimates to the jury that defendant had a prior criminal record.” State v. Cumbo, 9 Ariz.App. 253, 256 , 451 P.2d 333, 336 (1969).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“Once a federal court upholds a collateral attack on a judgment of conviction following a defendant’s first state trial, the decision of the federal court becomes the law of the case. Further proceedings in any later trial based upon the same facts must be in conformity with the habeas corpus decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.