Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Bedell 423 - People v. . Most

People v. . Most’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 district · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2009 · most notably Gitlow v. People of the State of New York (1925), United States ex rel. Turner v. Williams (1904)

2 district · 80 state decisions — followed in 15 states

18019021910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Muller · Rapier Dupre · People v. . Most · People v. Ruggles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the right to publish is thus sanctioned and secured, the abuse of that right is excepted from the protection of the constitution, and authority to provide for and punish such abuse is left to the legislature. The punishment of those who publish articles which tend to corrupt morals, induce crime or destroy organized society, is essential to the security of freedom and the stability of the state.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish Ms sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of the right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech, or of the press. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * It is a disturbance of public order by 'an act of violence, or by any act likely to produce violence, or which, by causing consternation and alarm, disturbs the -peace and quiet of the community. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.