Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Beeler 334 - Wright v. Wiles

Wright v. Wiles’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
6
states following
June 1964
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1964

11 state decisions

501938194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Bills; readings; passage; signing; approval. “Section 18. Every bill shall be read once on three different days, and be passed each time in the House where it originated before transmission to the other. No bill shall become a law until it shall have been read and passed, on three different days in each House, and shall have received on its final passage, in each House, the assent of a majority of all the members to which that House shall be entitled under this Constitution; and shall have been signed by the respective Speakers in open session— the fact of such signing to be noted on the Journal; and shall have received the approval of the Governor, or shall have been otherwise passed under the provisions of this Constitution. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We find it difficult to perceive just how the licensing of photographers and regulation of the taking and finishing of pictures, with the exceptions therein set forth provided for by this Act, £has any real tendency to protect the public safety, the public health or the public morals’; or bow and why ‘the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference’ as this Act provides. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.