Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 BR 376 - In Re King

In Re King’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Mazzeo v. United States (1997), Sylvester v. Dow Jones & Co. (In Re Sylvester) (1982)

3 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

2501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109

Relies on 109 F. Supp. 200 - In Re Silver · Clark v. Dutton · In re Cook · In re Davis Mfg., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured; or “(B) right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right to payment whether or not such right to an equitable remedy is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured;””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a debt is not liquidated if there is a substantial dispute regarding liability or amount”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.