9 BTA 448 - Morrow v. Commissioner

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1941

1 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1OPINION.

Love:

¶2By section 216 (c) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924, it is provided that in computing the normal tax a single person shall be allowed a personal exemption of $1,000 and the head of a family shall be allowed an exemption of $2,500, except that the Revenue Act. of 1921 restricts this exemption to $2,000 where the net income is in excess of $5,000.

¶3The petitioner takes the position that during the years 1923 and 1924 he was the head of a family and is entitled to the exemption of *450$2,000 and $2,500 for the respective years. The respondent contends that the petitioner is entitled only to the exemption of $1,000 provided in the case of a single person.

¶4We have heretofore had occasion to pass upon the question involved in this proceeding in Hannah D. Stratton, 5 B. T. A. 1025.

¶5In view of the Board’s reasoning in the above-quoted proceedings, we are of the opinion that the petitioner herein was not the head of a family within the meaning of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924.

¶6Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Considered by Trussell, Smith, and LittletoN.