Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 B.T.A. 645

Preston v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 19, 1927

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1927-12-19

Determination and collection of tax held to be barred by the period of limitation prescribed by statute. Wirt Franklin v. Commissioner,7 B.T.A. 636.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1931

Relies on Franklin v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*648OPINION.

Phillips :

¶2The petitioner pleads that determination and collection of the tax here involved is barred by the period of limitations prescribed by statute and also sets up a defense upon the merits to such tax liability. The facts in the instant case bring it squarely within the decision of this Board in Wirt Franklin v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 636, holding that in such circumstances as here exist the determination or collection of deficiencies would be barred after April 1, 1924, in the absence of some such factor as an estoppel against the taxpayer. In view of our decision upon this question it becomes unnecessary to examine into the defense which is raised upon the merits.

¶3Reviewed by the Board.

¶4Decision will be entered for the petitioner.

/9/bta/645 · .json · Public domain