9 Cal. 67
Decided July 1, 1858
California Supreme Court · decided 1858-07-01
<p>Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District.</p> <p>The facts upon which this case turned, appear in the opinion of the Court.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1858-07-01
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1911
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant, having failed to give notice of his intention to move for a new trial, or to file his statement within the time *68limited by the statute, lost his right to move for a new trial. (Practice Act, § 195.)
¶2There is no statement on appeal; the statement for new trial not having been filed in time, is not properly a part of the record. We can only look at the judgment-roll; which, being regular on its face, judgment is affirmed, with costs.