9 Cal. 3d 24 - People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably 16 Cal. 3d 211 - People v. Rist (1976), 24 Cal. 4th 889 - People v. Cromer (2001)
4 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California v. Green · 6 Cal. 3d 628 - People v. Anderson · People v. Johnson · People v. Green · In Re Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[w]hether due diligence has been shown is a factual question to be determined according to the circumstances of each case. [Citation.] Unless there has been an abuse of discretion, the ruling of the trial judge will not be disturbed. [Citations.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Salas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.