Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 CALAPP2D 495 - Andrade v. Azevedo

Andrade v. Azevedo’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 1960
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1960

9 state decisions

601935194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bradbury v. Higginson · In Re Estate of Hincheon · 117 Cal. App. 231 - Sanders v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is appellant’s main contention that the payment of the claims by respondent and her assignor was that of a volunteer, for which reason no recovery can be had. “It is true that ordinarily a volunteer or stranger cannot claim subrogation against an estate for a debt that he has paid, for, to give rise to such a right the payment must be made by one who is personally interested in the same. Here, however, with reference to the funeral expenses and other items involved, all of the heirs, including defendant, knew of the arrangements for the payment of the same, and that plaintiff and her assignor had promised to pay them for the benefit of the estate, and they raised no objection to this plan. Moreover, an heir who has an interest in an estate and pays claims of this character against the estate does not act officiously, and is not a ‘volunteer’ within the rule that a volunteer is not entitled to subrogation. This being so, the estate should repay him. This is a proper and, indeed, a necessary rule in view of the fact that burial must often be provided for before an executor or administrator can be appointed. (Estate of Hincheon, 159 Cal. 755 [ 116 P. 47 , 36 L.R.A.N.S. 303 ].)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.