Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 CALAPP2D 612 - People v. Morgan

People v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 39 Cal. 3d 910 - People v. Montiel (1985), 127 Cal. App. 2d 104 - People v. Ottenstror (1954)

24 state decisions

80193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Northcott · 126 Cal. App. 623 - People v. Nolan · People v. Gilberg · People v. Egan · 96 Cal. App. 186 - People v. Nye

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... from the order of the Court denying defendant's motion for permission to withdraw his plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity; and further from the Court's order sentencing defendant to state's prison instead of recommitting defendant to a state hospital for further treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant who pleads not guilty by reason of insanity, without also pleading not guilty, thereby admits the commission of the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there were reasonable grounds to believe that at the time of the commission of the crime [the defendant] was legally insane....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.