Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Cal. App. 3d 255 - Pebbles v. Steven C.

9 Cal. App. 3d 255 - Pebbles v. Steven C.’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2017 · most notably Fare v. Michael C. (1979), 7 Cal. 3d 801 - Kirkpatrick v. Roderick P. (1972)

60 state decisions

48019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mapp v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The effect of this decision is to declare as unconstitutional the preponderance of evidence standard provided for in Welfare and Institutions Code section 701 and to overrule California cases which have held the statute constitutional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 11 Cal. App. 3d 1193 - In Re Thomas G.
  2. “It shall be the duty of the probation officer to prepare for every hearing [of criminal charges against a juvenile] a social study of the minor, containing such matters as may be relevant to a proper disposition of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fare v. Michael C.
  3. “as a representative of the state which stands in loco parentis to the minor in a proceeding whose primary consideration is the minor's welfare. (See In re Florance, 47 Cal.2d 25, 28 [].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 207 Cal. App. 3d 1227 - In Re Danielle W.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.