Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 CALAPP5TH 1147 - Sheley v. Harrop

Sheley v. Harrop’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 29 Cal. 4th 82 - Navellier v. Sletten · 29 Cal. 4th 69 - City of Cotati v. Cashman · 1 Cal. 3d 93 - Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. · 39 Cal. 4th 260 - Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif · 42 Cal. 3d 490 - Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Legislature's choice of the term 'motion to strike' reflects the understanding that an anti-SLAPP motion, like a conventional motion to strike, may be used to attack parts of a count as pleaded.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “( Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 793 , 804, 187 Cal.Rptr.3d 36 ( Bergstein ).)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As used in this section, 'act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue' includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest; or (4) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.