People v. Bunyard’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 24 Cal. 4th 415 - People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co. · 30 Cal. 4th 894 - Robert L. v. Superior Court · 39 Cal. 3d 836 - People v. Weidert · 53 Cal. 3d 467 - People v. Bouzas · 233 Cal. App. 4th 1085 - People v. Rivera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“theft of merchandise or goods displayed for sale”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“It would make no sense to distinguish, for purposes of misdemeanor versus felony treatment, between the intended theft of merchandise worth $ 10 to $ 15 and the intended theft of coins worth $ 10 to $ 15, simply because the former is openly displayed and offered for sale and the latter is not.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“used a tool to effectuate the intended theft or force to attempt to break into the coin box.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.