Flake v. Neumiller & Beardslee’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 24 Cal. 4th 317 - Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc. · 50 Cal. 4th 512 - Reid v. Google, Inc. · 231 Cal. App. 3d 367 - FPI Development, Inc. v. Nakashima · 42 Cal. 4th 503 - Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLP · 91 Cal. App. 4th 875 - Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCort
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we may bypass the strict 'three-step paradigm for summary judgments' where, as here, there are no disputes about the record. [Citations.] Further, where the briefing agrees on factual or procedural matters, we may accept those matters as conceded. [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. Sorenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.