Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 CALAPP5TH 736 - People v. Salas

People v. Salas’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 25 Cal. 3d 436 - People v. Wende · 25 Cal. 3d 754 - People v. Harvey · 42 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Western Air Lines, Inc. · 39 Cal. 4th 1164 - Wells v. One2One Learning Foundation · 23 Cal. 4th 896 - People v. Mendoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'an opinion is not authority for a proposition not therein considered' "].) We proceed to examine the law to determine whether it applies to the present case. Text of the Statute " 'Under settled canons of statutory construction, in construing a statute we ascertain the Legislature's intent in order to effectuate the law's purpose.' [Citation.] To determine legislative intent, the court's first step in statutory construction is to 'look to the words themselves, giving them their ordinary meanings and construing them in context.' [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(J) Expenses to install or increase residential security incurred related to a violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5, including, but not limited to, a home security device or system, or replacing or increasing the number of locks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “residential security expenses are recoverable under section 1202.4(f)(3)(J) only when they are 'incurred related to a violent felony, as defined in section 667.5, subdivision (c).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.