Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 CONNAPP 498 - Sweeny v. Sweeny

Sweeny v. Sweeny’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably 19 Conn. App. 146 - Albrecht v. Albrecht (1989), Goold v. Goold (1987)

36 state decisions

140198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturman v. Socha · Connolly v. Connolly · Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of Fairfield · Jacobsen v. Jacobsen · Downs v. National Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This intent must be determined from the language of the instrument and not from any intention either of the parties may have secretly entertained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as unallocated alimony and child support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.