¶1 Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of Van Arsdale v. King (155 N. Y. 325).
¶2 All concur.
9 E.H. Smith 667
49 N.E 1104
Decided March 22, 1898
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1898-03-22
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 3, 1897, affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion for an interlocutory order and judgment in an action for an accounting
Relies on 9 E.H. Smith 325 - Van Arsdale v. . King
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1898-03-22
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1943
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of Van Arsdale v. King (155 N. Y. 325).
¶2 All concur.