Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 F.2d 1014 - Shaw v. Work

Shaw v. Work’s Empirical Analysis

9 F.2d 1014 · 1925

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 1971
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Midwest Oil Co. · Linn Lane Timber Company v. United States · Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United States · United States v. Smith · Byron v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The President, in the order here in question, is attempting neither to create a forest reserve, nor add to one already existing. He merely withdrew the land from settlement pending action by Congress, which alone has the power under the act to create forest reserves within the states therein named. In other words, the President withdrew the land, not to create a forest reserve, but that Congress might. However, the power of withdrawal is inherent in the President without the express authority of Congress. United States v. Midwest Oil Co., 236 U.S. 459 , 35 S.Ct. 309, 59 L.Ed. 673.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.