Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 F.2d 313 - In re Lucey Mfg. Corp.

In re Lucey Mfg. Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

9 F.2d 313 · 1925

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
July 1990
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1990

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5019251930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simonson v. Sinsheimer · Moulton v. Coburn · Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co. · Ohio Motor Car Co. v. Eiseman Magneto Co. · In re Freeman Cotting Coat Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All this has no very near relation estoppel, as the appellants seem to suppose. Under that term is proper-jy included the conduct by which a person once wronged may disqualify himself from any effective complaint. It presupposes that the wrong has existed, and that the victim has had a remedy; it concerns itself only with whether the remedy has been lost. Such are the usual instances of assignments for the benefit of creditors, or receiverships, cases where the creditors might at one time have brought the estate into bankruptcy. The question is whether taking part jn such proceedings concludes one fr0m repudiating them later. As the law is not in general interested in the mere consistency of suitors, vacillation may not be fatal. Perhaps others must act upon the faith of what one says before one is estop-ped.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.