Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 F.2d 944 - In re Bibbey

In re Bibbey’s Empirical Analysis

9 F.2d 944 · 1925

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1978

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

20192519301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hogg v. Ruffner · 218 Mo. App. 68 - General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Weinrich · Smith v. Kaufman · Davidson v. Davis · Blake Bros. v. Askew & Brummett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘On a bona fide sale of merchandise on a credit at a higher price than the purchaser would have to pay for cash, no charge of usury can be predicated, for the element of lending and borrowing money is absent.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.