Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 F.3d 1016 - United States v. Rosenthal

United States v. Rosenthal’s Empirical Analysis

9 F.3d 1016 · 1993

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably United States v. Autuori (2000), United States v. Vilar (2013)

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

240199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1954 · 26 U.S.C. § 165

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Stirone v. United States · United Families of America v. Kendrick · United States v. Miller · Andrijevic v. Kelleran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]llegations in an indictment that go beyond the essential elements which are required for conviction do not increase the Government's burden”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[the courts] have consistently permitted significant flexibility in proof, provided that the defendant was given notice of the core of criminality to be proven at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.