United States v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 1025 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Voigt (1996), Kasza v. Browner (1998)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Sullivan v. Louisiana · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Francis v. Franklin · Wheat v. United States · Grunewald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule, courts do not disqualify an attorney on the grounds of conflict of interest unless the former client moves for disqualification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daniels v. State · Kasza v. Browner“any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement or in any oil, gas, or other mineral royalty or lease, any collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or in general, any instrument commonly known as a “security”; or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing; but shall not include currency or any note, draft, bill of exchange, or banker's acceptance which has a maturity at the time of issuance of not exceeding nine months, exclusive of days of grace, or any renewal thereof the maturity of which is likewise limited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t may have been proper for the court to determine preliminarily whether or not an item could possibly be a security” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 2311 , but thereafter the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.