Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 F.3d 1060 - Deloitte Noraudit A/S v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, U.S.

Deloitte Noraudit A/S v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, U.S.’s Empirical Analysis

9 F.3d 1060 · 1993

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
7
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Thomson-Csf Sa v. American Arbitration Association, Charles Grigson River City Films Inc

23 federal appellate · 7 district · 11 state decisions

3601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · United States v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he federal policy favoring arbitration is even stronger in the context of international transactions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ordinary principles of contract and agency.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Noraudit failed to object to the Agreement when it received it and . . . knowingly accepted the benefits of the Agreement through its continuing use of the name `Deloitte.' Thus, Noraudit is estopped from denying its obligation to arbitrate under the 1990 Agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.