United States v. Molen’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 1084 · 1993
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably United States v. Castner (1995), United States v. Blake (1996)
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Wright v. Wright · Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation · United States v. Daughtrey · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, these findings of fact must key a defendant's financial resources, financial needs, and earning ability to the type and amount of restitution.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n order to assure effective appellate review of restitution orders, this circuit requires sentencing courts to make specific, explicit findings of fact on each of the factors set forth....”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“adopting a presentence report that recites adequate recommended factual findings.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.