United States v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 1182 · 1993
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Ross (1994), United States v. Lopez (1994)
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3561 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 842 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Minnesota v. Murphy · Reed v. Ross · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Royall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e cannot accept that [a probationer] has an additional right to avoid the express conditions upon which he was granted probation.... He must make a choice. If he is to enjoy the advantages of supervised release, he must comply with any lawfully imposed conditions of probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial doubt that, in the final analysis, the district court regarded [the remaining valid bases for its decision] to be ... independent and adequate ground[s] for the revocation of [Fischer's] supervised release”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the absence of some affirmative showing of an intention to repeal, the only permissible justification for repeal by implication is when the earlier and later statutes are irreconcilable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.