United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 1245 · 1993
Citation profile
43 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Hickok (1996), United States v. Ross (1996)
43 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Liegl v. Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an irreconcilable jury verdict does not warrant reversal of a criminal conviction [because] each count in an indictment is to be considered as a separate indictment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the defendant's participation in a scheme to defraud; (2) defendant's commission of the act with intent to defraud; and (3) use of the mails in furtherance of the fraudulent scheme.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we will affirm if 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' " United States v. Walker, 9 F.3d 1245 , 1249 (7th Cir.1993) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 319 (1979)) (emphasis in original). "We make this determination by viewing the evidence and the reasonable inferences which can be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.