Estate of Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 237 · 1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2010
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. · Pavelic v. Marvel Entertainment Group · Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 11 is not a fee-shifting mechanism and does not create an entitlement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.