Noltie v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
9 F.3d 802 · 1993
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Bennett v. Mueller (2003), Moran v. E.k. McDaniel (1996)
33 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Engle v. Isaac · Patton v. Yount
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal habeas review is barred unless the prisoner can demonstrate cause for the procedural default and actual prejudice, or demonstrate that the failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a defendant perceives a constitutional claim and believes it may find favor in the federal courts, he may not bypass the state courts simply because he thinks they will be unsympathetic to the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wassenaar v. Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.