¶1(nem. con.) overruled the-objections, saying that it was not necessary that the appointment of Perley, by the two other arbitrators should be in writing; nor that the award should state that the two had disagreed before they appointed Perley. These facts may be proved by parol. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
9 F. Cas. 973
Frye v. Scott
U.S. District Court
Decided May 15, 1828
U.S. District Court · decided 1828-05-15
Decided 1828-05-15