Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 FLA 215 - O'Connor v. State

O'Connor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1860

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably United States v. Wood (1936), 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State (1959)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

801860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Holding this ruling of the General Court of Virginia as correct, we are of opinion, that if the prisoner, at any time before any juror was or jurors were sworn, had retracted his election of such juror or jurors and expressed his desire to challenge him or them, it was his right to do so until the whole of his peremptory challenges were exhausted."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`The true doctrine is, that if the juror's conceptions are not fixed and settled, nor warped by prejudice, but are only such as would naturally spring from public rumor or newspaper report, and his mind is open to the impressions it may receive on the trial, so as to be convinced according to the law and the testimony, he is not incompetent.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"... this Court is unanimously of opinion that the right of a prisoner to challenge any juror peremptorily is absolute at any time before the juror is sworn, and that no circumstances can bring that right within the discretion of the court so long as it is confined to the number of peremptory challenges allowed by law."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.