Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 FRD 423 - Barnhart v. Jones

Barnhart v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
November 1963
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 654

Relies on Vincennes Steel Corp. v. Miller · Kirby v. United States · Friedman v. Washburn Co. · The Vernon · Goldsmith v. The Syracuse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) At the request of any party subpoenas for attendance at a hearing or trial shall be issued by the clerk of the district court for the district in which the hearing or trial is held. A subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a hearing or trial may be served at any place within the district, or at any place without the district that is within 100 miles of the place of the hearing or trial specified in the subpoena; and, when a statute of the United States provides therefor, the court upon proper application and cause shown may authorize the service of a subpoena at any other place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The objections are based upon three main grounds: First, that mileage for the witness from New York and those from Pittsburgh should be limited to a distance of 100 miles from the place of trial * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Economy in litigation is an essential element of justice. Taxation of unlimited mileage allowances is in derogation of this principle, and cannot be permitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.