9 F. Supp. 2d 534 - Tutu v. Blackman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1329 (§ 279 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc. · Kaczmarczyk v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Terrazas-Garcia · Nocon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review ... any other decision or action of the Attorney General the authority for which is specified under [Title II of the INA] to be in the discretion of the Attorney General....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] stay of removal is another means to remain in the United States beyond a specific date, similar to an extension of voluntary departure.” See 9 F.Supp.2d at 537 n. 6. 6 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.