9 F. Supp. 2d 925 - Miller v. Material Sciences Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · Travel All Over the World, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia · Hollinger · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Deliberately ignoring `red flags'... can constitute the sort of recklessness necessary to support § 10(b) liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.