Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 FSUPP3D 950 - Harvey v. AB Electrolux

Harvey v. AB Electrolux’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1 · 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 251 (Employee Commuting Flexibility Act of 1996) · 29 U.S.C. § 254 · 29 U.S.C. § 259

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Scott v. Harris

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.