Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Haw. App. 214 - Todd v. Todd

9 Haw. App. 214 - Todd v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 7 Haw. App. 111 - Eaton v. Eaton · Boulton v. Boulton · Magoon v. Magoon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Following the entry of a decree of divorce, or the entry of a decree or order finally dividing the property of the parties to a matrimonial action if the same is reserved in the decree of divorce, or the elapse of one year after entry of a decree or order reserving the final division of property of the party, a divorced spouse shall not be entitled to dower or curtesy in the former spouse's real estate, or any part thereof, nor to any share of the former spouse's personal estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “subsequent income assignment orders.” 8 . See footnote 6 above. 9 . As a matter of statutory interpretation, we conclude that the time from the filing of a notice of appeal of the family court’s decree deciding part (4) [division and distribution of property and debts] to the entry of the appellate court’s judgment on appeal is excluded when computing HRS § 580-56(d)’s”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.