9 Haw. App. 291 - State v. Matsuda’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rita v. United States · Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6 · State v. Grindles · 6 Haw. App. 554 - State v. Souza · State v. Christie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n meeting the foundational prerequisites for the admission of the Intoxilyzer test result[,] there must be a showing of strict compliance with those provisions of the [Hawai#i Administrative Rules governing the testing of blood, breath, and other bodily substances for alcohol concentration ( HAR)] which have a direct bearing on the validity and accuracy of the test result.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dumford · State v. Ferrer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.