Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Haw. App. 591 - Schubert v. Saluni

9 Haw. App. 591 - Schubert v. Saluni’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ellis v. Crockett · Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc. · 2 Haw. App. 400 - Smothers v. Renander · Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp. · Zator Ex Rel. Zator v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Attorneys’ fees in actions in the nature of assumpsit, etc. In all the courts, in all actions in the nature of assumpsit and in all actions on a promissory note or other contract in wilting that provides for an attorney’s fee, there shall be taxed as attorneys’ fees, to be paid by the losing party and to be included in the sum for which execution may issue, a fee that the court determines to be reasonable; provided that the attorney representing the' prevailing party shall submit to the court an affidavit stating the amount of time the attorney spent on the action and the amount of time the attorney is likely to spend to obtain a final written judgment, or, if the fee is not based on an hourly rate, the amount of the agreed upon fee. The court shall then tax attorneys’ fees, which the court determines to be reasonable, to be paid by the losing party; provided that this amount shall not exceed twenty-five per cent of the judgment. [[Image here]] The above fees provided for by this section shall be assessed on the amount of the judgment exclusive of costs and all attorneys’ fees obtained by the plaintiff, and upon the amount sued for if the defendant obtains judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.